Campaigners have questioned the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) on the future of the Kensington High Street cycle lane, with the council, which has previously been accused of “choreographing” press statements against cycle lanes, replying that they “will have a think about it”, while also ignoring expert advice and manipulating consultation data for two years.
In December 2020 at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, RBKC controversially removed the protected cycle lane from Kensington High Street, just seven weeks into a scheduled 18-month trial and before construction on the scheme had been fully completed, after backlash from reportedly 0.2 per cent of the residents.
Earlier this week, active travel campaigners attended the council’s committee meeting and raised a demand for “no more delays” as they pressured the Conservative-controlled borough to bring back the protected cycle lane, claiming that there was “still no progress towards safe cycling on this dangerous road”.
Rachel, an NHS worker from Kensington and member of resident-group Better Streets for Kensington and Chelsea, said at the meeting: “It's now two and a half years since you took out the cycle lanes. I and thousands of others have to cycle daily on this dangerous road. Where is the sense of urgency? Does my safety not matter?”
After removing the cycle lane wands, the council commissioned a study by the think-tank Centre for London, and the report recommended having a… protected cycle lane, separated from motor traffic by either wands or raised kerbs, with the latter being the more preferred alternative.
After removing the protected cycle lanes in 2020, the council commissioned a study by @centreforlondon. Guess what the study recommended?
Yup, protected cycle lanes. 2/ pic.twitter.com/kH7WZ7fuND
— London Cycling Campaign (@London_Cycling) April 26, 2023
However, RBKC, after delaying commencing the consultation process for six months, added an option of painted cycle lanes in the survey, despite being “emphatically not recommended” by the report.
Rob Whitehead, from the Centre for London said: “At no point did Centre for London suggest painted line bike lanes are an appropriate solution to making journeys on Kensington High Street safer and more sustainable. Because they are not. They fail the DfT standard for safe cycling given the volume of motor vehicles. They just don't pass the smell test. Children aren't safe on them, and nor are adults.”
London Cycling Campaign wrote on social media that the council manipulated the survey results to conclude that painted cycle lanes are much more popular than protected cycle lanes, even though they clearly weren’t.
“The panel survey results look misused in an attempt to show that painted line bike lanes are favoured. Yet some of your own numbers don't support this. On safety the combined score of the protected options are favoured by 42% of respondents vs only 14% for painted lanes,” said Whitehead.
The campaigners have asked the council for urgent action. However, RBKC has now replied to them: “We have now done some sort of modelling and design work of what a lane could look like across the street…there are some decisions within that we are going to have to think about.”
LCC further added: “Urgency? What urgency? It’s been over two years since the cycle lanes were removed. No more delays. Kensington High Street needs to be made safe. Now.”
> Campaigners lose High Court case against council over “premature” cycle lane removal
The backlash against the council’s delay comes a month after campaigners lost their High Court case against RBKC over the “premature” removal of the cycle lane. The dismissal of their legal challenge was described as a “hollow victory by a borough that seems happy to put people cycling on its streets in danger”.
Better Streets for Kensington & Chelsea, who are also behind the legal action, claimed it to be an “irrational” and “clearly and radically wrong” decision which amounted to an “abuse of power” by the local council.
These are not the only times that the single-minded councillors have gotten themselves involved in the installation of the cycle lane. In March last year, RBKC's refusal to reinstate the emergency cycle lanes on Kensington High Street in a decision condemned by Labour councillors as “completely bonkers”.
LCC campaigner Clare Rogers had said: “Kensington and Chelsea is clearly incapable of behaving as a responsible local authority for this highway, or following its own policies on road safety and the climate emergency.”
> PM Boris Johnson ‘ballistic’ over scrapping of Kensington High Street cycle lane
And just two months before that, an FOI request had revealed that RBKC had ‘choreographed’ press statements from local businesses when announcing the abandonment of the Kensington High Street segregated cycle lanes.
Forbes reported that RBKC attempted to coordinate the response to its announcement that the scheme would be abandoned with its head of news editing what was supposed to be an independent press statement from the chair of Kensington Business Forum (KBF).
An initial quote from KBF said: “We had hoped, like many others that the temporary cycle lanes would have been a success but unfortunately due to the current climate it has not benefited our High Street businesses.”
This was tweaked to say: “Like many others, we hoped the initiative would be a success. Unfortunately it has not helped our High Street businesses attract customers at a vital time for them, so it is good news that the lanes will be removed.”
An RBKC spokesperson said: “Agreeing statements with partners, community groups, and stakeholders in advance of announcements is standard practice.”
> Motor traffic journey times increase after Kensington cycle lanes removed
During the seven weeks of installation of the bike path, cyclist numbers more than doubled to about 3,000 daily along the busy A-road, with Transport for London saying that it had “no discernible effect on traffic congestion”.
However, since its removal, TfL’s traffic cameras showed that congestion had worsened, with average trip times on the 1.1-mile stretch of the road rising by more than two minutes when travelling east, and almost a minute for cars travelling west.
Besides worsening congestion, there are numerous accounts of footage proving how dangerous the road is for cyclists, who have to squeeze their way through the motor traffic on a key route into central London for people coming from the west.
Tonight I travelled home along Kensington High Street, back to its old lethal self after the cycle lane was ripped out — very nasty stretch of road to commute down, and now even more dangerous pic.twitter.com/huqsnik7xl
— Jeremy Vine (@theJeremyVine) December 8, 2020
At the time of the removal of the bike lane in December 2020, there were protests by teachers, parents and pupils at a nearby school pleading the council to keep it in place. The Mayor of London Sadiq Khan also reportedly condemned the decision, while then Prime Minister Boris Johnson was said to have gone “ballistic” about it.
The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea have been approached for a comment.